Britain’s New Left-Wing Government Suspends Some Arms Export Licenses to Israel

The UK’s Labour government has suspended arms export licenses to Israel amidst rising human rights concerns.

At a Glance

• The UK has suspended some arms export licenses to Israel due to concerns they may be used to violate international humanitarian law.
• The suspension covers components for military aircraft, helicopters, drones, and targeting equipment.
• The decision affects 30 out of 350 existing arms licenses.
• Israeli officials expressed disappointment and concern over the decision.

UK Government Suspends Arms Export Licenses

The British Labour government, has suspended 30 out of 350 arms export licenses to Israel due to fears that British weaponry might be used in Gaza, contributing to alleged human rights violations. Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced that the decision was taken following a rigorous review sparked by complaints from MPs and international organizations shortly after the Labour government took office in July.

This suspension affects components for military aircraft, helicopters, drones, and targeting equipment but mostly excludes F-35 fighter jet components due to international influences. Meanwhile, non-military export licenses like those for trainer aircraft and telecommunications equipment remain unaffected.

Israeli officials have expressed disappointment and concern over the UK’s decision, especially in light of ongoing conflicts and hostage situations. 

A statement from Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant highlighted the nation’s frustration: “This comes at a time when we fight a war on seven different fronts – a war that was launched by a savage terrorist organisation, unprovoked. At a time when we mourn six hostages who were executed in cold blood by Hamas inside tunnels in Gaza.”

David Lammy emphasized the action was not a full arms embargo and was executed with regret. 

“We have not – and could not – arbitrate on whether or not Israel has breached international humanitarian law. This is a forward-looking evaluation, not a determination of innocence or guilt. And it does not prejudge any future determinations by the competent courts,” Lammy explained.

Lammy cited evidence of mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners and restrictions on humanitarian aid as critical factors in their decision. The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) added that Israel had not provided satisfactory reasons for its actions, and the decision was based on “a clear risk that the equipment could be used to commit serious violations of international law.”

While the Labour government aims to demonstrate ethical governance, it faces criticism from various quarters. Amnesty International UK criticized the suspension as “too limited,” suggesting it still risks complicity in potential war crimes. Some Labour MPs advocate for a complete ban on arms sales to Israel, whereas critics argue the current measures are not sufficiently robust.